Promoting the shift towards greater gender equity in healthcare

UBC Professors Dr. Lori Brotto and Dr. Saraswathi Vedam are redefining healthcare to be more equitable, inclusive, and just. Discover how they are reshaping the future of care for women, gender-diverse people, and marginalized communities.

Conversations with our community is an Internal Communications feature which showcases UBC faculty or staff who are making an important impact on the lives of others.

In this, our first edition, we hear from Dr. Lori Brotto, Professor, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Dr. Saraswathi Vedam, Professor, Midwifery about their research and what motivates them to advance knowledge about women's health.

From advocating for respectful maternity care, to improving sexual and menopause-related health, they work tirelessly to help improve health outcomes for communities across Canada, and beyond. Their research efforts are driven by the stories of inequity and discrimination they hear from their patients. Every day, they come face-to-face with women and gender-diverse people whose genuine health concerns have been dismissed due to gender disparity in health research.

In the following Q&A, they discuss their passion for improved women's health research and what they hope to achieve through their work. 

Dr. Lori Brotto

Provide an overview of your current research area/s. 

LB: The overall goal of my research program is to advance women’s sexual and menopause-related health by generating and disseminating new knowledge to women, healthcare providers, and the general public. My approach is deeply rooted in sex- and gender-based analysis and a comprehensive understanding of life course, aging, and the social determinants of health. Sexual health problems affect as many as one in three women, yet they often go unrecognized and untreated. Despite their prevalence and impact, persistent disparities in care leave many women suffering in silence—underscoring the urgent need for greater awareness, diagnosis, and support.

My research focuses on creating, testing, and implementing digital health tools to address sexual dysfunction in women, as well as specific subpopulations such as cancer survivors.

 

What first motivated you (or motivates you) to conduct your research/work?

LB: I am motivated by a desire to close the gap in sexual health care for women. Sexual problems in women are common, distressing, and impact many facets of quality of life. Yet, there are barriers that prevent women and gender-diverse people from accessing care. As such, my research has more recently focused on digital health adaptations of effective mindfulness-based and psychological treatments for sexual dysfunction in women, and examining how such approaches can be scaled effectively.

 

"In women’s health, there has been a long standing disparity with regards to our knowledge about various health conditions, and how effective treatments are for women.  
Thankfully, the tide is starting to turn and we are making headway in addressing these inequities."


— Dr. Lori Brotto


In your opinion, why does gender inequality exist in healthcare research? 

LB: In women’s health, there has been a long standing disparity with regards to our knowledge about various health conditions, and how effective treatments are for women. In part, this has been due to inequitable allocation of research funding to women’s health, and a lack of recognition that both sex and gender impact many facets of health, including sexual health. Thankfully, the tide is starting to turn and we are making headway in addressing these inequities.

 

 

Dr. Saraswathi Vedam

Provide an overview of your current research area/s. 

SV: My research focuses on creating tools to measure healthcare quality, designing surveys to gather important information related to health equity in perinatal services, working with experts to agree on new ways to improve care, and partnering with communities to make research more meaningful and relevant to them.

My scholarship focuses on measuring how different types of care, where someone gives birth, unfair differences in care, and teamwork among healthcare providers affect people's experiences during pregnancy and childbirth.

As Principal Investigator of UBC’s Birth Place Lab, I oversee the transdisciplinary coalition of researchers, community leaders, clinicians, policy makers, legal scholars, and health systems leaders who are actively engaged in advancing high-quality care from pre-conception through early parenting. My team has worked with service users to develop and validate several patient-reported experience measures of respect, autonomy, mistreatment, and equitable access to effective models of care. Our work is focused on: measurement of equity, safety and respect; designing accountability systems for rights-based care; improving health professional education on cultural safety; and expanding representation in the perinatal research and clinical workforce.

My provincial and national studies in the US and Canada examine the links between experience of health services, models of care, and perinatal health disparities. 

 

What first motivated you (or motivates you) to conduct your research/work?

SV: Following my Masters studies on the beneficial effects of upright positions for birth, I spent 17-years working as a midwife in homes, small community hospitals, and large tertiary care centers across the United States. During that time, I witnessed large disparities in outcomes and experiences among my very diverse clientele, many of them attributable to identity and place of birth. I had questions about how best to integrate the lessons I learned about the impact birth environments have on the physiology of labour and birth, and on women’s well-being, across health systems. I started by querying why 98 per cent of certified nurse-midwives (CNM) in the US, who were regulated to attend labour and birth in all settings, primarily practice in hospitals. As a clerk, I had been mentored by CNM who offered a model that included continuity, relationship-based care in all settings including homes, so integration across settings was normalized for me, and seemed to be the logical, safest model for families.

I conducted my first study on the factors associated with CNMs willingness to attend home birth, which included measurement of attitudes. Later, when I came to Canada, where all midwives in BC attended births at home and in hospitals, I adapted that measure to explore cross-disciplinary differences in attitudes to community birth.

As I learned more about the context for care and underserved populations in BC—including forced relocation of Indigenous women for birth and lack of access to midwives—my questions shifted to exploring experiences of perinatal services among historically marginalized communities. I began to explore community-based participatory action research methods—where we are in constant dialogue with the client and family about their priorities and preference for care.  When I listened to women across communities, they were speaking of autonomy, respect, and mistreatment. 

 

In your opinion, why does gender inequality exist in healthcare research? 

SV: Gender inequality in health care research is just an extension of gender inequities that have existed for generations across the world in education, the workplace, economic independence, family roles, and human rights. Funding structures are designed to value those who have historically held positions of power, access, and influence. In my lifetime those values and people in power have shifted dramatically towards greater gender equity, so I am hopeful for the world my daughters and granddaughter will live in.

 

How does your position as Executive Director of the Women’s Health Research Institute (WHRI) at BC Women’s Hospital help you improve health outcomes for women?

LB: The WHRI is one of three Canadian research institutes dedicated to advancing research in women’s health. With over 700 members across BC doing research across all pillars of health research, I have been in awe with the the dedication of these scientists, their trainees, and their teams in making critical discoveries that have advanced women’s health research and its translation into better health for all women. 

The WHRI is focused on providing critical supports to advance the women’s health research enterprise, and we have particular expertise in knowledge mobilization and translation. It has been an honour to lead this institute for almost 10 years.

 

What have you learned during your research career that has surprised you the most?

LB: The resiliency of women. My research has largely focused on women with sexual dysfunction, and also on cancer survivors or populations with other co-occurring health comorbidities that impact sexual health.

I have been so inspired to witness the dedication of women to improving their sexual health, even among those who have been suffering for years or decades. It is a wonderful testament to the flexibility and adaptability of women to life and health circumstances.

 

"I have been so inspired to witness the dedication of women to improving their sexual health, even among those who have been suffering for years or decades. It is a wonderful testament to the flexibility and adaptability of women to life and health circumstances."

— Dr. Lori Brotto

 

How does your position as Principal Investigator in UBC’s Birthplace Lab help you improve health outcomes for women?

SV: My team works tirelessly to increase equitable access to high quality perinatal care. They are remarkable individuals who demonstrate energy, commitment, and outside-the-box thinking. I am continually learning from my clients, their families, my students and mentees, and interdisciplinary colleagues about what reproductive justice research means and what we can achieve together, especially when we focus on research findings that are actionable.

For example, if the research finds that people feel unheard by providers, we can teach person-centred communication. If the findings reveal disarticulation between what is known about how to facilitate human physiology and the complex infrastructures that exist in institutions, yet most people give birth in hospitals, we can hold the health systems accountable to the science by building a multi-dimensional facility-level quality measure of birth environments. If research reports disparities in perinatal outcomes and experiences among people who identify as minoritized or racialized, we can co-create accountability tools to shine a light on the drivers of those inequities. If our research shows that the Indigenous midwifery model improves autonomy, respect, and health outcomes for the whole family, then we can use our broad networks to expand the visibility of that model. 

 

What have you learned during your research career that has surprised you the most?

SV: I have found unexpected kindred spirits in unlikely leadership roles in the community and in the traditional power structures that are equally committed to social justice and change. I was delighted to learn that our tools are now being used in 65 countries. I see how using data to speak truth to power feels fraught with risk but is ultimately liberating and I now understand that the long game is worth it.

"I hope that more people who experience pregnancy and childbirth will be seen and treated with warm and uplifting regard, irrespective of their identity, circumstances, background, or personal resources."

– Dr. Saraswathi Vedam

Describe any interesting research milestones you are approaching.

LB: We have been working on a digital health intervention called eSense, which delivers evidence based mindfulness and cognitive behavioural therapy skills to women with sexual problems. After eight years of rigorous feasibility and efficacy testing, we are excited to focus now on the commercial scale-up of eSense to cancer and menopause centres around North America.

 

What do you hope will change as a result of your research/work? 

LB: My hope is that our treatments can be disseminated in clinics and to healthcare providers to ensure that women of all ages and social locations have access to care.

 

Describe a turning point which altered the course of your work/personal life and led you to where you are today?

LB: A turning point for me was when Viagra was approved as a treatment for men’s sexual dysfunction 25-years ago. In that same year, a pivotal study was published showing that over 40 per cent of women have sexual concerns. This led me to do a dive into the literature on female sexual health, where I discovered that there was very little research on women’s sexual health. From then on, I switched my research to focus exclusively on women’s sexual health. 

Since then I have dedicated my career to research that seeks to advance our knowledge about women’s sexual health, clinical practice focused on psychological treatment of sexual difficulties, and teaching and mentorship of the next generation of sexual health scientists and practitioners. 

Describe any interesting research milestones you are approaching. 

SV: My team is examining findings from the RESPCCT(Research Examining the Stories of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Canada Today) study which gathered data from over 6,000 people across Canada about their experience of receiving care during pregnancy and childbirth in the past 10 years. So far, the results are sobering and instructive. The way forward to improve perinatal services for all families is by tackling health disparities between marginalized populations and the dominant population.

As Principal Investigator on the Justice and Equity in Perinatal Services Hub, my team and I are preparing to disseminate two new tools designed to support facilities, educators, and accreditation bodies in embedding culturally safe, respectful, and physiologic birth practices into routine care. We will continue to engage provincial and First Nations health authorities, health profession colleges, hospital accreditation bodies, and risk management organizations to position these tools as standards for assuring equitable and high quality care.

 

What do you hope will change as a result of your research/work? 

SV: I hope that more people who experience pregnancy and childbirth will be seen and treated with warm and uplifting regard, irrespective of their identity, circumstances, background, or personal resources. I hope that the healthcare system of the future will be trusted by historically underserved, stigmatized populations. I would like to see more Indigenous, racialized, queer, and/or people with disabilities in care provider or health equity research roles. I hope that the Canadian trend towards funding those who have historically been excluded or devalued, keeps growing.  

 

Describe a turning point which altered the course of your work/personal life and led you to where you are today?

SV: There are several formative experiences that underpin my work today: 

  • my father's teachings on non-violent approaches to social justice and rigour in research;
  • my experience growing up as racialized immigrant in North America;
  • my mother's teachings on the value of honouring our heritage, culture and extended family;
  • the wrongful incarceration of my only sibling;
  • my introduction to feminist thought and advocacy in the first class of women at Amherst College;
  • my experiences as a health professional in a poorly understood profession in North America;
  • my work with racialized, Indigenous, immigrant, and underserved families;
  • having a life partner that embodies the give and take of gender equity; and
  • my experiences as a mother to four strong, independent, women who keep me accountable.

If you are a faculty or staff pairing whose research or work at UBC is making an important impact on people’s lives, and you wish to be considered for Conversations with our community, please contact the UBC Internal Communications team: internal.communications@ubc.ca

Written by Meadhbh Monahan, UBC Internal Communications
Interviewed in May 2025

  • Our people
  • Research
  • Faculty
  • Staff
  • UBCV
  • Feature story

Find the latest news, updates, events, and useful dates from across UBC, curated for faculty and staff by Internal Communications.
Access a library of resources from multiple UBC websites, all in one place.

UBC Crest The official logo of the University of British Columbia. Urgent Message An exclamation mark in a speech bubble. Arrow An arrow indicating direction. Arrow in Circle An arrow indicating direction. Caret An arrowhead indicating direction. Time A clock. Chats Two speech clouds. Facebook The logo for the Facebook social media service. Feedback Dots inside a speech bubble, indicating discussion. Information The letter 'i' in a circle. Instagram The logo for the Instagram social media service. Lightbulb A lightbulb inside a circle. Linkedin The logo for the LinkedIn social media service. Location Pin A map location pin. Mail An envelope. Menu Three horizontal lines indicating a menu. Minus A minus sign. Parking The letter 'P' inside a circle. Telephone An antique telephone. Play A media play button. Plus A plus symbol indicating more or the ability to add. Search A magnifying glass. Submit content An inbox filled with paper. Team A group of people inside a circle. Twitter The logo for the Twitter social media service.